Mytholder ([info]mytholder) wrote,
@ 2008-01-07 01:16:00
Previous Entry  Add to memories!  Tell a Friend!  Next Entry
Entry tags:now we are here

Now We Are Here, General Transmission #19
>C-link engaged
>PROSPERO network open/emergency/secpro: null/xprospero
>SUBJECT: SECURITY BREACH
>Core Security Breached!
>Unauthorised Access: Main Computer Module!
>Initiating Emergency Procedures!
>Initi>>>>>>
>CORE OFFLINE
><<>>>intru-
>Rerouting C-LINK to Cargo Pod 17
>Cargo pod 17 not found
>C-LINK OFFLINE
>C-LINK OFFLINE
>C-LINK REBOOTING...
>No AI found. Abort/Retry/Fail?
>(F)ail... switching to backup systems
>C-LINK DIST. 1%...10%...50%...90%...done.
>C-LINK ONLINE
>C-link engaged
>BACKUP network open/emergency/secpro: null/xcogburn
>SUBJECT: ATTENTION ALL HANDS
At 0132, ship's time, a security team entered the computer core and deactivated the ship's artificial intelligence, Prospero. This operation encountered no resistance, and no injuries were incurred or inflicted. The AI's core program has been suspended and a full level 0 diagnostic of all systems is underway. If there is a reason for Prospero's odd behaviour, we will find it.

Although we were able to secure the computer core, the Flight Crew quickly learned that Prospero had gone offline. There were some disturbances, most of which were quickly dealt with by my security staff. The one remaining problem is a hard core of approximately twenty-five Flighters who have retreated to a sealed complex of modules at the rear of the ship. I am confident that this last group can be pacified without significant damage to the ship or loss of life among the crew.

Many have questioned my handling of this situation. To them, I say this - we are in a precarious and fragile situation. We are alone on an alien world. Ganymede and the other Jovian moons are gone, swallowed up by a rapacious AESIR. The colony vessels that went out are the last vestiges of a free humanity - and we cannot hope that the other colony ships found such appealing and welcoming worlds as this one.

I was at Io when hostile AIs breached our computer network and took over Hell City's environmental controls. I watched friends die in agony, their skin sloughing off their flesh in sickly gobbets when they were flash-boiled. I've seen what happens when AESIR saboteurs get inside your defences. If we cannot trust our computers and our ship, we are done for.

It is my intent to have Propero's diagnostics completed as quickly as possible. If all is well, then the mission can continue as normal. If not, well, we shall deal with that eventuality when it arises.

The first problem, though, are the remaining Flighter insurgents. I believe the best approach is to send an EVA Assault Team out along the hull of the ship, and board their sealed section from the outside. It should be a simple operation. In the mean time, we should start ferrying the other Flight Crew to the surface, at least those who can stand the higher gravity of the planet. Having the Flighters concentrated on board an increasingly empty ship is just causing unnecessary divisions.

I have no intention of subverting the will of the consensus - but bold and forceful action is needed when the very medium of consensus is potentially untrustworthy.

Thank you for your co-operation in this time of crisis.
Cogburn

Poll #1116779
Open to: All, detailed results viewable to: All

What's the next step?

View Answers

Negotiate with the Flight Crew
10 (27.0%)

Take the drive section by force
5 (13.5%)

Reactivate Prospero as soon as possible
13 (35.1%)

Demand Cogburn turn control over to the captain
4 (10.8%)

Demand Cogburn turn control over to majority consensus
5 (13.5%)




(Post a new comment)


[info]bluegargantua
2008-01-07 02:28 am UTC (link)

Run diagnostics and restart Prospero. Unless this will take a significant amount of time, there's no need to assault the Flight Crew, just prevent them from wreaking a lot of damage.

Why did the C-LINK reroute to Cargo Pod 17? What was stored there?

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]rivet_geek
2008-01-07 07:18 am UTC (link)
I'm not sure, but Prospero's gibberish after jettisoning the cargo modules may hold a clue: http://mytholder.livejournal.com/245020.html#cutid1

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]cerandor
2008-01-07 10:08 am UTC (link)
Good catch. I'll work on extracting something useful from it, if that's a possibility.

I'm now severely regretting my decision to remain on board. Heat-seeking worms and trundling monstrosities seem appealing when compared to a PTSD-suffering military headcase who seems intent on grabbing control in order to root out enemy infiltrators who may or may not be wholly imaginary. His evident pathological distrust of AIs and determination to turn this into an "us-or-them" situation is going to cause nothing but pain.

-Dr. Cerandor

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]luddism
2008-01-07 08:57 pm UTC (link)
Agreed - I'll assist, the sooner we have clear information the quicker we can start making informed decisions.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]allandaros
2008-01-07 03:15 am UTC (link)
"If we cannot trust our computers and our ship, we are done for." And what about, oh, I don't know...our fellow humans in the form of the flight crew? What the heck does "pacifying" the flight crew mean? Terminating, perhaps with extreme prejudice?

Right now, I haven't seen any untrustworthy actions from the flight crew, or from Prospero. The only untrustworthy actions are coming from you. Stand down.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]snarg
2008-01-07 04:12 am UTC (link)
Prospero definitely was acting a little odd. We need those diagnostics run and run properly. Are there any engineers involved in that operation? If not I volunteer.

Why is it a problem that some Flighters have separated themselves from what's going on? It seems understandable to me.

At what point can we just disarm the ship and turn it over to them? I suspect that they'll be more comfortable living there than here.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awakedreamer
2008-01-09 09:44 pm UTC (link)
At what point can we just disarm the ship and turn it over to them? I suspect that they'll be more comfortable living there than here.

Not in the near future, that I can tell you for sure. The ship is still full of sleepers. The re-awakening process stalled at some point, and we've had to continue it manually since then...

Dr. Awakedreamer

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarg
2008-01-09 09:47 pm UTC (link)
Good to know. Thanks.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awakedreamer
2008-01-09 09:54 pm UTC (link)
Btw, Snarg, don't you think that the communication between the different crews is a bit weak?

I'm making an effort to share most (if not everything) of the medical crew's findings, but I'm unsure that the rest are doing it :-S.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarg
2008-01-09 09:58 pm UTC (link)
Good point.

I think maybe we don't have a good system for sharing information. Stuff gets lost when it gets posted in these threads because only a few people see it. How can we fix this?

Maybe we need a wiki.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awakedreamer
2008-01-09 10:09 pm UTC (link)
I thought of choosing "speakers" for each group responsible for sharing the different findings, but a wiki is probably better .

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]joecrow
2008-01-07 08:10 am UTC (link)
I have no intention of subverting the will of the consensus - but bold and forceful action is needed when the very medium of consensus is potentially untrustworthy.

Thank you for your co-operation in this time of crisis.


That's without a doubt the alarming thing I've heard a human say in decades. The fact that you're referring to the flight crew as "insurgents" tells me very nearly all I need to know about you and your attitudes towards both the flight crew and the ground crew. I'd demand that you stand down, but you do not strike me as the sort of person for whom moral or ethical persuasion holds much force.

So, let me instead propose this to the consensus: I move that Mr. Cogburn be removed from command of security. At this moment, he's demonstrated far more dangerous ambition and reckless disregard for human life than Prospero has ever even hinted at.

If eh allows himself to be removed and replaced, then he's simply a paranoid ideologue. If, as I expect, he refuses and begins to refer to us as "insurgents" or other epithets, then we see exactly who it is we're dealing with. And then we can try and see if there's anything we can actually do, or if we are merely serfs in lab coats.

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awakedreamer
2008-01-09 01:52 am UTC (link)
I second the motion. The man has clearly lost it...

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]snarg
2008-01-10 06:47 am UTC (link)
It's important that we get this diagnostic done. This doesn't contradict anything either of you is saying, but I don't want to see it get lost in whatever happens next.

(Reply to this)(Parent)


(Anonymous)
2008-01-07 10:44 am UTC (link)
Oh, well frickin' done, Mr Cogburn. With one act of rampant paranoia, you've split the mission crew and set us into armed factions. I'm sure that'll turn out just great in the long run. Your foresight and diplomatic subtlety are to be commended. [Slow clap].

Ok - so, here's what needs to be done.

1: Complete the damn diagnostic and have the results independently assessed by someone without an axe to grind. Preferably have the raw results dumped onto the public hub so everyone can see them. If there's evidence of AESIR (or any other) tampering, then I'll eat crow and my lab coat. If there's not - Mr Cogburn to be relieved of command and placed under psych evaluation immediately.

2: Check out this Pod 17 thing. Again - results to be shared with the entire mission crew - including the flight crew. If the flight crew have something to answer, then let them answer it in public.

3: All armed teams to STAND DOWN. There will be no aggressive actions against members of the flight crew. Open a channel of negotiation with them, explaining the reasoning (if you can call it that) behind what's been done. Express particularly the disgust that many members of other teams have towards Cogburn and his actions and reaffirm the solidarity of the mission crew. The one glimmer of sense in Cogburn's ranting is that we're one of the last colonies of free humanity. We're not going to last long if we're divided into paranoid camps.

4: Can someone in psych give us a listing of the evaluations for the Security team and give us a likely breakdown of their loyalties? We should know if Cogburn enjoys widespread support among Security, or if they're just following orders at the moment. We also need to know who we can rely on if things get ugly and we need to remove Cogburn forcibly.

5: If Security is busy running an armed coup, just who's protecting the colony base from the heat-loving, buzz-saw-wielding xenos who've got their pseudopods on our security equipment?

P.
Astounded at free humanity's genius at screwing itself over at the first opportunity.

(Reply to this)(Thread)


[info]doogs19
2008-01-07 06:21 pm UTC (link)
I agree with this post. While I'm not there to fully experience this, it makes the most sense to me. Then again ... worms.

-The Good Doctor

(Reply to this)(Parent)(Thread)


[info]awakedreamer
2008-01-09 01:59 am UTC (link)
4: Can someone in psych give us a listing of the evaluations for the Security team and give us a likely breakdown of their loyalties? We should know if Cogburn enjoys widespread support among Security, or if they're just following orders at the moment. We also need to know who we can rely on if things get ugly and we need to remove Cogburn forcibly.

As far as I can tell no psych evaluation has been done on the Security team after the re-awakening. They just didn't present themselves when the routinary checkouts were taken.

My guess though is that they're just following his orders at the moment (at least most of them). Should it be needed I volunteer for approaching Cogburn and his security team for the much needed evaluation.

Dr. Awakedreamer

(Reply to this)(Parent)


[info]flatvurm
2008-01-07 05:04 pm UTC (link)
Seriously...what the hell happened here? Aren't we all in this together?

(Reply to this)


[info]amcathra
2008-01-07 09:47 pm UTC (link)
We need Prosspero secure, vetted and functioning as soon as possible. An explanation for the various glitches is needed, but the investigation needs to be transparent and with sufficient oversight as to be reliable.

As an engineer I'll volunteer to review the diagnostic process and shutdown logs, resolve any issues, and hopefully initiate the reboot procedure speedily.

(Reply to this)


Create an Account
Forgot your login?
Login w/ OpenID
English • Español • Deutsch • Русский…